Skip to content
Awareity
Awareity

The Pre-Incident Prevention Experts

Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Awareity Butterfly Effect
    • In The News
    • Contact
    • Support
  • Solutions
    • Information Security Training
      • Information Security Awareness Training
      • Awareness and Accountability Vault (AAV)
    • Prevention and Connecting the Dots Platform
    • First Preventers Framework
    • Prevention and GAP Assessment
    • Threat Assessment Teams
    • Climate Surveys
    • Partners in Prevention
    • Industries
      • K12
      • Higher Education
      • Diocese
      • Healthcare
      • Government
      • Corporate
  • Blog
  • Info Request

UCLA Stabbing Puts Focus on College Students' Mental Health

By: Awareity
On: October 28, 2009

Could stabbing have been prevented?

A recent article discussing the brutal stabbing of a UCLA student in chemistry lab has raised difficult questions asking why disturbed students are allowed to remain at school despite red flags and obvious warning signs. 

Since Virginia Tech, campuses across the Nation have been working to identify troubled students and potential warning signs of mental illness, violence or other problems.  However, identifying red flags and connecting the dots across multiple people (students, faculty, dorm advisors, mental health, law enforcement, etc.) can be extremely difficult and seemingly very complex. 

  • Students and faculty members said that the UCLA attacker had exhibited erratic and delusional behavior in the past.
  • One professor notified campus authorities about paranoid and accusatory e-mails the UCLA attacker had sent to him.
  • Other professors made similar individual reports about the UCLA attacker.
  • The UCLA attacker also received counseling at the Student Affairs office.

 

Were any of these incidents enough  of a concern to force the student into treatment?  Had each of these dots been connected, could the stabbing have been prevented?

It may be impossible to know for sure, but schools could definitely implement more proactive steps to connect the dots. For example, school leadership should ensure that all faculty, school administrators, school security officers, school resource officers, counselors, parents, and students understand their roles and responsibilities for reporting suspicious incidents and behavioral red flags.  Would anyone disagree that prevention efforts are more effective and less expensive than recovery efforts?

2009-10-28
Previous Post: Does Your Organization Send PII and PHI Through the Mail?
Next Post: E-mail Spoof Defeats Technology…Are Your People Prepared?

READ MORE:

WATCH MORE:

Not seeing the form to request information? Drop us a line and we’ll send you more information!

Recent Blog Posts

Higher Ed Research facts, silos, and different actions

April 10, 2025

Community Research facts, silos, and different actions

April 10, 2025

K12 Research facts, silos, and different actions

April 3, 2025

Bias-based Decisions Can Be Overcome

December 4, 2024

First Preventers Believe…

October 18, 2024

Rick Shaw, Founder & CEO

Click here to learn more about Founder, CEO, and Prevention Specialist, Rick Shaw.

Awareity on Twitter

Tweets by Awareity

Search

Tweets by Awareity

Support

Need more information on
Support for AAV or TIPS?

Click here

What are you looking for?

Connect the Dots With Us!

 | |

Designed using Dispatch Premium. Powered by WordPress.

This site uses cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. Continuing to use this site means you are agreeing to the use of cookies.Ok