Skip to content
Awareity
Awareity
Primary Navigation Menu
Menu
  • Home
  • About
    • About
    • Awareity Butterfly Effect
    • Contact
    • Support
  • Solutions
    • Information Security Training
      • Information Security Awareness Training
      • Awareness and Accountability Vault (AAV)
    • Prevention and Connecting the Dots Platform
    • First Preventers Framework
    • Prevention and GAP Assessment
    • Threat Assessment Teams
    • Climate Surveys
    • Resellers
    • Industries
      • K12
      • Higher Education
      • Diocese
      • Healthcare
      • Government
      • Corporate
  • Blog
  • Info Request

Plausible Deniability, In Loco Parentis and Connecting the Dots

By: Rick Shaw
On: October 10, 2014



An article by Guy Bliesner and Brian Armes was brought to my attention…and in full disclosure I know both Guy and Brian, and I think they do great work with school security assessments and more.

Their article was called:

There Is No Such Thing as Plausible Deniability in School Safety
http://www.campussafetymagazine.com/article/there_is_no_such_thing_as_plausible_deniability_in_school_safety1

Their article explained a “commonly held and deeply disturbing issue of concern” involving campus and district administrators: “If we do an assessment, we will be at a greater risk liability”.

The article goes on to point out how the legal doctrine of in loco parentis assigns responsibility to educators for student safety and security and it includes a “duty to care”. The article closes by pointing out “knowledge is power” and “The bottom line: there is a duty to care. Plausible deniability…….Don’t think so”.

Connecting the dots…

The article by Guy and Brian is valuable because it brings attention to some of the most dangerous gaps in schools – awareness gaps between in loco parentis, duty to care and perceived risk liability.

Dangerous awareness gaps have been exposed over and over in numerous post-incident reports. As a matter of fact, the data from post-incident reports almost always reveals how preventable incidents, headlines, lawsuits and tragedies failed to be prevented even though students, faculty, staff and others associated with the school were aware of pre-incident indicators.

When it comes to “liabilities” for school officials and educators…and based on real-world incidents… which of the following has more liability?

Preventing an incident from happening.
Or
Reacting to an incident and trying to cover up or explain why you did not prevent it?

The real key to student safety and reducing liabilities is taking action. One of my favorite words of wisdom comes from Napoleon Hill:

“Action is the real measure of intelligence.”

In dealing with next generation students, risks, obligations and liabilities…knowledge is not enough.

Surviving In the Next Generation Requires Knowledge and Action!

If you want to see some of the actions leading schools are taking…click here.

2014-10-10
Previous Post: Awareity Wins Campus Safety BEST Award
Next Post: ABA: An Avalanche of Regulation

READ MORE:

WATCH MORE:


Get Solutions For Your Challenges!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Don't worry, we will only call if you request "Phone" as your contact preference. We hate spam calls too!


Not seeing the form to request information? Drop us a line and we'll send you more information!

Recent Blog Posts

Bad News, Good News, and Better News

March 1, 2023

Lawsuits and Settlements Trending Sky High

February 17, 2023

Oklahoma State Department of Education Launches Awareity’s Prevention Platform & Tools

November 10, 2022

A Screw In Your Tire & Pre-Incident Prevention

August 23, 2022

When You Don’t Know What Others Know…Bad Things Can Happen (and are happening)

June 10, 2022

Support

Need more information on
Support for AAV or TIPS?

Click here

What are you looking for?

Connect the Dots With Us!

| |

Designed using Dispatch Premium. Powered by WordPress.